What were the differences between how England and France ruled their colonies?

What was the difference in how England and France ruled their colonies?

The French practiced direct rule. They sent oficials and soldiers from France to rule the colony. … The British on the other hand relied on indirect rule. They used local rulers to govern the colonies.

What was the difference between British and French colonies?

France expected that their colonies would always be part of France. They used an approach of assimilation which involved introducing their culture to the colonies. Britain trained their colonies to be self-governing. They were treated as self-governing entities with colonialists to govern them.

How did France rule their colonies?

Colonies were ruled, on the one hand, through decrees issued by two different ministries (the Ministry of the Interior and the Colonial Office) in Paris and, on the other hand, by executive orders that made the representative of the French government the main source of the law.

THIS IS FUNNING:  How much is college in France in US dollars?

What was the difference between the French and the British in colonial leadership?

The British relied on native princes and local troops to maintain control. The French sent French colonial governors to maintain control. Students were sent to France and England to study abroad before allowed to lead and control their country.

How did the English colonies differ from Spanish and French colonies?

How did English colonists differ from Spanish or French colonists? Spanish and French colonist were olny going to the americas for fur trads,gold and silver. England went there to get religious freedom and land. … The main reason for the English colonies to settle was for Religious Freedom.

Why were the British colonies more successful than the French?

The British were ultimately more successful than the Dutch and French in colonizing North America because of sheer numbers. … The rulers back in Europe actually made it very difficult for French and Dutch settlers to obtain and manage land. They tended to be stuck on the old European model of feudal land management.

How did French and British imperialism differ?

The British overall were distant from local people, viewing colonial populations as essentially different from European populations. By comparison, the French imperialists gave lip service to the view that colonial populations could become French citizens if they assimilated.

What was the difference between French and English settlements quizlet?

What was the basic difference between french and English attitudes about the land they acquired in north america? The French came to be fur traders and travel and work with the Indians. The British came to farm to give anal to native Indians.

THIS IS FUNNING:  Question: Is French Polynesia part of Schengen?

What was one major difference between England’s colonies and those of other European powers like the Spanish and the French?

What was one major difference between England’s colonies and those of other European powers like the Spanish and the French? England’s colonies attracted a much larger number of permanent settlers. Why did South Carolina pass laws preventing slaves from gathering together?

How did the British rule their colonies?

Each colony had its own government, but the British king controlled these governments. … This meant that they could not govern themselves and make their own laws. They had to pay high taxes to the king. They felt that they were paying taxes to a government where they had no representation.

Why did England colonize?

◦ England wanted to start an American colony to increase their wealth and power so that they could compete with other European countries like Spain and France. ◦ They were hoping to be able to find silver and gold in America. (This would help increase their wealth!)